AI and the Hydra Effect: Securing Outdated OT Before the Threat Swarm Arrives

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is accelerating the pace and scale of cyber-physical threats; outdated operational technology (OT) provides an exposed attack surface that terrorist and criminal networks can exploit faster than defenders can respond. Publicly documented vulnerabilities, coupled with AI-enabled reconnaissance and exploit generation, create a self-reinforcing Hydra of attackers and infection vectors. This article, part of an ongoing examination of AI’s dual-use implications, frames how legacy OT, adversarial innovation, and illicit marketplaces intersect; and outlines actionable steps in AI policy, infrastructure investment, workforce readiness, and systems design to prevent cascading failures in critical infrastructure.

Introduction – Past Systems Are Inadequate to Support a Safe Future

Civilization rests on systems that were designed to be invisible. Elevators, traffic lights, and water treatment plants quietly sustain daily life without fanfare. But they were built decades ago in an era when physical sabotage, not cyber exploitation, was the primary risk.

These systems are stable but brittle. They prioritize uptime over security; in many cases, applying a patch introduces more risk than leaving the vulnerability untouched. For years, this trade-off held because exploiting them required expertise, time, and physical access.

Artificial intelligence changes that balance. It allows bad actors to scale reconnaissance, tailor exploits, and replicate successful attacks faster than defenders can respond. Like the Hydra of mythology, where one severed head grows back as two, AI threatens to multiply both the vulnerabilities and the adversaries who exploit them.

This fragility rests on three compounding truths:

1. Antiquated technology underpins critical infrastructure. Legacy code and outdated hardware assumed ‘security through obscurity’; a philosophy that no longer holds.
2. The exploit map is already written. Once an OT vulnerability is demonstrated, whether in a single elevator or a piece of localized software, it becomes a template.
3. Bad actors will always adopt innovation faster than defenders. Terrorist networks and criminal groups have always leveraged emerging tools; AI now supercharges that adoption.

Together, these truths form the Hydra’s body; a creature that regenerates faster than you can cut it down.

WHAT – The Variables Driving the Next Wave of Exploitation

The threat is not abstract. It emerges from three converging variables: outdated operational technology; publicly available exploit logic; and the accelerating innovation curve of bad actors powered by AI.

1. Operational Technology (OT) Is Built for Stability, Not Security
Water treatment plants, power grids, traffic control systems, and elevator networks were engineered in an era when physical access was the primary threat vector. Updating them risks catastrophic downtime or hardware incompatibility; so many remain frozen in time, locked into old software because changing them is riskier than leaving them exposed.

2. The Exploit Map Is Already Written
The vulnerabilities in these systems are documented and, in some cases, commoditized.

At a cybersecurity conference, operational technology researcher Deviant Ollam walked through a series of physical, social engineering, and cyber strategies using elevators as his storyboard. Small lapses in operational awareness, convenience-driven shortcuts, and human error allow attackers to bypass even well-intentioned safeguards.  Small lapses in operational awareness, convenience-driven shortcuts, and human error allow attackers to bypass even well-intentioned safeguards. Employees lose restricted keys that are never properly deactivated. Front desk staff can be socially engineered into granting unauthorized access. Widely available tools like the Flipper Zero, paired with a low-cost antenna, can unlock restricted panels without leaving obvious traces. Many of these legacy systems lack detailed logging, allowing breaches to go unnoticed until consequences cascade.

This is not about elevators specifically; it is a window into how consistent OT logic can be exploited anywhere.

On a much larger scale, the NotPetya attack in 2017 revealed the same principle. A single vulnerability in Ukrainian software cascaded into a global logistics incident, disrupting hospitals, shipping ports, and corporations far beyond its intended target.

Once an OT vulnerability is publicly understood, whether physical, social, or digital, it cannot be ‘unknown.’ It becomes part of an exploit map that any motivated actor can follow.

3. AI Accelerates the Cat-and-Mouse Game
Terrorist organizations and criminal networks have historically leveraged new technologies faster than defenders. AI collapses the skill barrier even further; automating reconnaissance, generating tailored exploits, and spreading successful attack strategies at machine speed.

What was once the domain of highly skilled nation-state operators is now accessible to decentralized, loosely coordinated cells. One success no longer creates isolated damage; it creates a Hydra of new threats, each head growing sharper and faster.

HOW – Exploitation Becomes Scalable, Replicable, and Rapid

This convergence does not just create more attacks; it changes their nature.

1. The Hydra Effect – Many Vectors, Many Attackers
AI creates two hydras. One grows from infection vectors; the other from the attackers themselves.

The Infection Vector Hydra – One Breach Becomes Many
NotPetya showed how one localized exploit unintentionally spread to hospitals and shipping hubs worldwide. AI would actively scan global OT networks, tailor payloads for specific environments, and deploy optimized variants in hours. One breach becomes a living exploit library.

The Bad Actor Hydra – One Attacker Becomes Many
In the past, a single skilled attacker might produce a handful of novel attacks over months. AI allows one bad actor to simulate dozens of attack scenarios, architect new exploit chains, and automate deployment in hours. One individual becomes a swarm of themselves, iterating faster than defenders can respond.

Together, these two hydras feed each other; each new exploit makes the next one easier to copy, while each AI-enhanced attacker becomes a rapid prototyping lab for future threats.

2. Terrorist and Criminal Networks as Digital Marketplaces
Modern terrorist organizations operate within global illicit economies, buying and selling stolen data, renting infrastructure, and laundering funds through fraud and cryptocurrency. These networks use low-risk scams as testbeds for refining tools and tactics.

Groups like the Russian-speaking cybercrime syndicate Evil Corp (responsible for the Dridex banking malware) and Conti-affiliated ransomware cells have been documented collaborating with extremist networks, selling ransomware kits, and laundering funds through crypto exchanges. According to a 2023 Europol threat assessment, “the criminal use of cryptocurrencies has become more evident in 2023, as has the number of requests for investigative support that Europol has received” (Europol, Internet Organised Crime Threat Assessment, 2023).”

AI supercharges this shadow economy. Generative models craft multilingual phishing lures, write malware, automate social engineering, and even generate deepfake audio/video to bypass identity checks. What was once bespoke capability for state actors becomes off-the-shelf tooling for decentralized terrorist networks.

3. Mimetic Spread – Exploits as Behavioral Payloads
Every successful attack becomes a narrative template. Violent ideological movements have long mirrored tactics—hijackings in the 1970s, lone-wolf shootings in the 2000s—because if it worked once, it will work again.

Now AI makes that spread instant. Attackers can describe their goal in plain language—‘disable a city’s traffic signals during rush hour’—and receive actionable blueprints. One elevator exploit in New York inspires a transit system attack in Europe; which evolves into a power grid disruption in Asia. Each iteration inherits DNA from the last.

This is how an idea becomes a behavioral payload: spreading across encrypted channels and darknet forums, evolving with every replication.

WHAT IF / NEXT – Turning Recognition into Action

If we accept that AI is accelerating the attacker’s advantage, ignoring these vulnerabilities is a failure of governance. Four areas must adapt:

1. AI Policy Must Address Adversarial Use
AI policy cannot focus solely on economic growth. It must include adversarial risk frameworks; controlled release policies for high-risk capabilities; and mandated red teaming for models with OT exploitation potential.

2. AI + OT Hardening Requires Targeted Investment
Legacy OT cannot simply be patched overnight. We need AI-driven anomaly detection; segmented system design to contain breaches; and modernization roadmaps that balance stability with security. Public-private funding models and government-backed mandates are required.

3. National Skills and Learning Capacity Must Be Elevated
Security personnel, critical infrastructure operators, and local governments need AI-enabled threat training. The national polis must become AI-literate, capable of both defending against and understanding how AI changes the attack surface.

4. Systems Must Be Built for Resilience-by-Design
Future OT must prioritize graceful failure over brittle stability. Modular, adaptive designs with behavioral anomaly detection must replace monolithic legacy systems that assume attackers move slowly.

Closing Implication

If we do nothing, AI will amplify the Hydra, multiplying vulnerabilities faster than defenders can respond. Outdated OT will remain soft targets; terrorist networks will refine exploits faster than institutions can harden. The mimetic spread of successful attacks will normalize the weaponization of infrastructure.

But if we act now—reframing AI policy, investing in AI-enabled OT defense, elevating national skills, and redesigning for resilience—we can tilt the balance back toward stability.

Either we harden the forgotten systems that keep our world stable, or we accept they will become the very Hydra that unravels it.

The post AI and the Hydra Effect: Securing Outdated OT Before the Threat Swarm Arrives appeared first on Small Wars Journal by Arizona State University.