Countering Digital Authoritarianism: How Malaysia Can Secure Digital Sovereignty by Tokenizing Trade Finance

In an era of intensifying strategic competition and hybrid threats, digital infrastructure has become a new battlespace domain. Trade finance, typically seen as a bureaucratic and purely economic function, is now a potential vector for influence, coercion, and strategic dependencies. This challenge is particularly critical for growing mid-sized economies like Malaysia, whose location and industrial base place it at the center of Indo-Pacific supply chains, making digital infrastructure sovereignty a necessity in this context.

As China increasingly exports key building blocks for digital infrastructure, including semiconductors, 5G, and data center capacity under the guise of economic development, Malaysia faces a critical inflection point on whether it should integrate these technologies into its current trade ecosystems, especially considering China’s long-standing status as Malaysia’s largest trading partner.

This is also critical given today’s contested digital landscape, with economic platforms being a crucial emerging component of national defense. In this case, critical financial infrastructure would form a key part of a country’s national resilience framework. In this case, tokenizing trade finance on its own offers a path for Malaysia to secure its own digital autonomy and insulate itself against coercive influence in the ever-prevalent digital world.

Trade Finance as a Geopolitical Vulnerability

Tokenization in trade finance refers to converting traditional trade documents and financial instruments, such as invoices, letters of credit, or bills of lading, into digital tokens on a secure blockchain, which is a decentralized, tamper-proof ledger maintained by a distributed network of computers. This allows for instant, verifiable, and programmable value transfer.

While this technology is often framed as a fintech solution, it holds critical strategic value as it reduces exposure to digital choke points, limits undue data transfer risks, and decentralizes liquidity flows in times of economic stress or sanctions. In this respect, tokenized trade finance better enables equal footing for parties participating in a transaction, bypassing the traditional cumbersome systems that place significant emphasis on intermediaries and trust. Crucially, by leveraging a distributed ledger, tokenizing trade finance resists single points of failure, making it more resilient to external pressures than traditionally centralized systems.

Malaysian micro, small, and medium enterprises (MSMEs), the key drivers of trade finance in Malaysia, are currently extremely reliant on manual, paper-based processes. Despite the country’s relatively robust digital retail payments industry, enabled by platforms such as Touch ‘n Go and Maybank’s MAE, its trade finance sector remains fragmented and split between analog and digital implementation.  A prime example of this can be seen in the rollout of mandatory e-invoicing and digital tax reporting tools in mid-2024. While a positive step toward modernization, this effort has seen uneven adoption, with many businesses struggling to align these new systems with legacy workflows, resulting in errors and delays in settlements.

Therefore, this mismatch between domestic digital innovation and enterprise-level infrastructure creates an exploitable vulnerability for Malaysia. In the event of a geopolitical dispute, threat actors could exploit these digital gaps through transactional blockades, data theft, or even ransomware attacks, disrupting cross-border trade flows. Therefore, ensuring digital infrastructure sovereignty is extremely important for Malaysia, particularly as supply chains become key battlegrounds for influence and coercion.

BRICS and the Challenge of Digital Infrastructure Sovereignty

The proposed BRICS Pay infrastructure, alongside digital infrastructure initiatives such as the Blockchain Service Network (BSN) and the possibility of Belt and Road Initiative-linked stablecoins, represent China’s increasing utilization of infrastructure tools as instruments of influence. This is particularly concerning for Malaysia, since, by default, these tools would come with governance models that reflect an authoritarian digital economy, a system where the government would exercise ultimate control over all data and digital platforms to the detriment of user privacy and innovation. As a result, countries that adopt them risk becoming locked into asymmetric dependencies with China, potentially affecting national data sovereignty and even economic continuity.

However, the launch of the national Malaysian Blockchain Infrastructure (MBI) in April 2025, a live digital asset sandbox, alongside its efforts to work with regional partners like Singapore through SGTraDex, showcases Malaysia’s desire for digital sovereignty, with its decentralized homegrown platforms serving as a key countermeasure to reliance on centralized foreign systems.

Economic Statecraft Through Tokenization

Tokenizing trade finance will enable Malaysia to maintain strategic ambiguity in its partnerships while avoiding digital dependencies. Additionally, this move could enable businesses to access new liquidity pools, including alternative and decentralized finance (DeFi) providers, within financing systems that are not overly dependent on any single external financial architecture. This fulfills a significant gap for Malaysian MSMEs today, with the MSME funding gap standing at $21.5b, which is equivalent to around 5% of Malaysia’s GDP.

To this end, Malaysia’s Securities Commission unveiled a proposal for tokenizing capital market products in mid-2025 and has since announced a digital asset regulatory sandbox. When combined with Malaysia’s existing global leadership in Islamic finance, tokenized instruments such as a proposed cross-border smart sukuk could enable greater financial inclusion on a global basis, with smart sukuks being Shariah-compliant bond-like financial instruments projected to be worth over $1t in 2025. In this case, smart contracts would automate and enforce Shariah concepts, enabling Malaysian-based financial innovation with both religious and strategic legitimacy.

Securing Malaysia’s Digital Infrastructure

In late 2024, Malaysia gained “partner country” status in BRICS, with cross-border yuan transactions growing 27% in Q1 2025. With China continuing to be Malaysia’s largest economic partner, Malaysia’s participation in BRICS does introduce the threat of subtle entanglement through digital platforms. A tokenized domestically-governed digital finance architecture gives Malaysia a hedge against these possibilities, enabling continuous cross-border trade despite the threat of sanctions, payment blockades, or the withdrawal of digital services by foreign entities.

Ensuring digital infrastructure sovereignty will help Malaysia secure its economic future. This is especially critical due to the increasing prevalence of supply chains, data, and economics in today’s definition of conflict, highlighting a distinct need for economic participation, continuity, and simultaneous national resiliency in light of gray zone conflict.

Malaysia’s 2020 blockchain pilot in palm oil supply chain traceability shows its early interest in applying blockchain to its national growth priorities. These capabilities could be drawn upon for expansion if tokenized trade finance becomes widespread, with use-cases including commodities, halal trade, and green finance, making Malaysia a credible standard-setter for secure, transparent, and Shariah-compliant trade systems.

Conclusion

As digital ecosystems become tools of geopolitical influence, Malaysia has a chance to lead in not only ensuring its own digital infrastructure sovereignty but also in securing its economic future. Tokenized trade finance is one key way that Malaysia can continue to grow economically while still engaging with China and other ASEAN nations. Additionally, securing digital sovereignty is a pillar of Malaysia’s broader national security strategy, with the ability to safeguard economic flows and assert control over digital infrastructure being key in this respect.

All in all, Malaysia could become a model for other mid-sized economies pursuing increased economic growth while maintaining digital infrastructure sovereignty, with trade finance tokenization providing Malaysia the unique opportunity to benefit from strategic competition without being consumed by it.

The post Countering Digital Authoritarianism: How Malaysia Can Secure Digital Sovereignty by Tokenizing Trade Finance appeared first on Small Wars Journal by Arizona State University.